Dossier of Peaceful Means (draft)

'Dossier of Peaceful Means'



I found a few things I had written on facebook a few years ago I thought You may like to read. Were I to write them today, I'm sure they would appear rather different and include new research (certainly omitting the included banter, which I encourage You to skip over).



It is by means of my sincerest interest and meditation that I present the 'Dossier of Peaceful Means'. It begins with a unique version of the Multiverse theory. The Multiverse, I feel/think/sense/discern is real and furthermore the 'other' dimensions aren't "out there"...the entirety of the Multiverse is right here. (Of course there could be a dimension where it isn't which does not disrupt the Dossier's model of Meta-Physics, I will get to that).



In our 3D/4D plane we imagine the X, Y and Z axis to continue indefinitely. This is not true. When you get to the end of the Universe you reappear from where you came, just like Asteroids video game where going off the right side of the screen brings you back in from the left. Modern mathematical constructs of our Universe dictate this (also relativity follows this logic, wherein you are walking and the world passes under just as much as you stand still when walking as the ground comes towards you). (Of course everything we know is theory which will not disrupt the Dossier's model of 'constructive' means). The axes are curved and interlock back into each other. Similarly the various realms and Dimensions interlock HERE.



What I know/discern/present comes from Teachers, Sages, Wise Women, Nature, Buddhas, Bodhisattvas and none of my knowledge comes from or belongs to me, (though I crave Wisdom and Peace and it is my aim). The Buddha met a clever monkey whom, as he told Buddha, "just traveled from Earth to Jupiter and jumped back while you weren't looking", to which the Venerable Buddha held out his forefinger and thumb - indicating the gap between the two and replied "oh you traveled from here?".



Please allow me to write and continue in a minute. I will continue this in comments sections.



Julien Landau Worry not of that which already has, is and will happen. Find the stillness in the eye of the hurricane as the storms of duality pass around while doing your best to not send and hold kites and parachutes taking you into the storm. The stillness lay on a foundation made of...that's right Peace. Not a static Peace, but one calmly yet passionately alive and thriving.







Julien Landau Why throw a kite into the storm if we are not compelled to. We operate via biomechanical 'logic' up to intellectual 'logic'. We follow patterns, it's how we operate, are taught, learn and grow. Patterns are recognised and employed with succesful patterns being the ones that replicate, and entrench. Neuropeptides are at the ready to receive and send specific combinations of hormones that regulate our attitudinal and emotional states. The more we are exposed to and engage in a means the more the body constructs similar neuropeptides eventually forming visible topographical changes to the greymatter of one's brain and these are known as channels.







Julien Landau We are compelled to belong. This is a pattern that has evolved. To feel needed and heard and important are instinctual macro-structures/drives. From an evolutionary standpoint our species was encouraged and the cultures (and genetics) that had no need were destroyed or amalgamated/synthesized and therefore diluted. We are raised with Language, the teachings of our parents the voice of society (and blood memory/ancestral Ki, more onthat later). Many patterns dictate our thoughts feelings wants deeds desires perspective. Many patterns can not be our own until we decide they are, for instance. Patterns, recognised/employed/passed become expectations/rules/norms/societal structures etc. These are known in Sociology as 'Socially Constructed Realities" or 'SCR's'.







Julien Landau The Buddha, having not rested until 'conquering himself' Discerned the following: There are various minds and realities, spirits entities, humans and SCR's social constructs here on Gaia Earth. One must harmonize all the vibrational patterns of one's Chakras' to arise out of the muddy waters of SCR's to choose a life as pure lotus. The stryfe that is the muck is adversity when perceptions and SCR's 'clash' within us and among us (or us and ecosystems). Gardeners know pruning encourage growth, adversity is a force to which we rise not a little but out of the delusion/Maya/Chaos principle (the muddy waters feeding the Brilliantly Impossibly white Lotus Flower!). Discernment is Chaos engineering with Intent for continued evolutionary success by means of 'stacking' (a concept I will explain shortly). We call brainwaves Alpha state, through Theta state depending on their Sine Wave frequency. A frequency passes an imaginary horizontal plane we call a threshold. While occupying the Ego-Identity we are using our pattern recognition intellect which is the waking state seen with the accompanying Alpha brainwaves passing up and down across the threshold. We are conscious on the up and downswing and at the threshold briefly are unconscious (on an intellectual level...our autonomic and other biomechanical as well as other minds remain aware, more on that later). The stomach contains almost enough neural connections to be a mind. We may connect to it (please see previous write up 'Gravity Wave Meditation'). The various awareness from 8 chakras operate emanate different amplitude and frequency Sine wave frequencies (and other shapes?). Put all frequencies in unison and there are no gaps in consciousness. The scribes wrote what Buddha found after his struggle facing the wall sitting meditating for 10 years. They wrote the Means by which I hope this write up may Highlight and promulgate as well. Truth and perceived truth has a way to come out and wants to be known, secrets ignorance illusion false means false prophets unaltruistic aims ultimately lead to stryfe and I am driven like a sleuth to Assess and Discern as I and we as a species are compelled towards 'stacking' (more on that later).







Ron Prussman Everything is everything. It is not our eyes, but our vision, that causes us to be blind to what is right in front of us.







Julien Landau I agree Ron Prussman Anthropologists are educated to not taint field data gathering with notions, preconceived of right and wrong as viewed by the culture and personal background. Of course it is inevitable. Expectation influences outcome in many cases. Our perspective is that of Newton's three Laws. However we currently have the Wonderfull fields of Quantum Mechanical theory, the Theory of Relativity as well as the Quest to unify the three Laws /fields/theories under the Grand Unified Field Theory.







Ron Prussman They still make the mistake of viewing the past through the perspective of the present. We don't know what those shaped rocks were used for, but we do know that they were found next to the fire pit. Ironically, the published papers are based on imagination, not observation.







Julien Landau Grand. Unified. Field. Theory. Each word deserves an explanation.







Ron Prussman I am a cynical, hyper, angry freak. We will need much alcohol to imbue.







Julien Landau From Grandest to smallest it's a circle. Unified, unifying even disharmony and chaos as factors. Field not static structure. theory not static law.







Julien Landau please refresh and alcohol is drunk by birds in the formof berries, mellows em out makes em glee chirp and what's good for the goose is good for the Grander







Ron Prussman I love chaos. It is true that they will always be marbles, but also true that they will never spill in the same pattern twice.







Julien Landau As observed by us at this moment perhaps. I have come to reeeallly like a version of the multiverse theory







Julien Landau The Universe a giant donut self aweare via sentient being's observation nothing moving just folding in and out of itself wherein all possibilities are real and meet here and we choose peace







Ron Prussman Science is a great curiosity. Whether one looks closer, or further away, the change in perspective also changes everything else.







Julien Landau Correct. All viewpoints realities are real.







Ron Prussman All views are also valid. They may not be agreeable, but they are still valid.







Julien Landau as well as not real. and both real and not real as well as various hybrids of these possibilities as well as all possibilities, including: neither, both true and untrue yet neither true nor untrue and true that that is both true when not true ad infinitum by definition







Julien Landau This is the 'Quantum Enigma'. How do we observe Newtons Laws yet atoms, which are supposed to be solid keep appearing in multiple places and changing elements and having varying numbers upon observation etc.







Ron Prussman Exactly! I used a lot of LSD in the 90's to end up learning that reality is a construct unique to the individual.







Julien Landau YES YHES YES!!!!!!!!!!







Julien Landau The answer is when looking at the quantum level we are seeing quite literaly the field of possibilities at work! Intersecting dimensions. WE choose what winds up being real here.







Ron Prussman At quantum level, a thumb nail looks like the entire universe. How did the philosophers predict that, hundreds of years before it was proven?







Julien Landau Leaving the ability to choose behind by watching too much crap on tv thinking your name and ego identity whose job it is to limit perception (identity is a filter) and you are fair game for the strings of SCR to get you to want and perceive to want and need incredibly odd social chatsky's while leaving the gateway of possibility shiut. A successful SCR gets you to pay attention to it to the exclusion of possibility.







Ron Prussman I own things. They have varying degrees of usefulness. The TV has been on the low end of that scale since 2011. I turned off the cable to enjoy life on-demand.







Ron Prussman Have you checked out Diaspora? Angry, artistic, political, intelligent people; social networking in an odd way (compared to twinteristbook). https://diasporafoundation.org/ Signing up seems complicated, but the lack of ads and censorship are cool. Hashtags are used to fill your feed, not friend lists...although you can 'follow' users. The diaspora* Project. Instead of everyone’s data being contained on huge central servers owned by a large organization, local…DIASPORAFOUNDATION.ORG







Julien Landau On the 7th Day of Creation, Adonai rested. Sleep. Still asleep and we are what the Creator dreams. Dreams can be cuddly yummy or nightmares. Choose Peace.







Julien Landau However, like Neo in the Matrix, Buddha discerned the Matrix and went to Reality aka Nirvana. With UltimateMagnificent Fortune he taught how. Ultimate Nirvana, even for Buddha (correct me if I'm wrong) occurs when ALL pieces of the hologram (us...containing the big picture in each of our puzzle piece lives as fractions of holograms do) all sentient Beings do as Jesus does, as Q'uan Yin did as well as other Human incarnations of Deity we have been recurring astoundling Gratefully Joyfully Loving Blessed to be visited and taught by







Ron Prussman You aren't wrong at all. Ben Franklin was. It has not been determined that one must die or pay taxes, until that individual succumbs to the constructs that would make that true.







Julien Landau Without long range strike capabilities it is always best to draw the enemy out into the open to strike from prepared/guard. In the Martial Arts the advantage is (for beginners) on the one who waits, draws fire and counters. Best to sit and wait and listen, discern than to react. Why do we react? When we perceive injustice to our identity that our name, honor, measure of correct and right threatened/afronted, our hearts broken etc.







Ron Prussman It is always best to react. There is no reason to waste effort.







Julien Landau Where do SCR's come from? What keeps them going? by 'Socially Constructed REALITY' how real is it? I defer to the analogy of the waitress who fought the night before with her boyfriend and her service is bad and a poor tip is left further providing proof things are bad leading to her giving up having no pay for the hours she left. The next day, after they had made up and he showed care and he proved without trying how much he'd learned, well today she is spry and slinging plates and everyone is happy with less food complaints and better tips. Which reality is true? Again,please allow an answer in the comments section.







Ron Prussman It is only real if one participates in it. From the outside, it looks like brainwashing. SCR seems natural, when you believe. I believe in me. I believe in you. I believe that peace is a process, and violence is an action. I also believe that 'we' can either engage in peace, or commit to violence. I also believe that we stand alone...together.







Julien Landau Well said Ron.







Ron Prussman Sharing is not an option. If one owns all of something, then it ceases to have value. The laws of scarcity and demand are only true if there is enough spread around to create demand and expose scarcity.







Ron Prussman OTOH...(gear shift, change lane)...Physics needs more work. I do not believe that the speed of light has been accurately measured. I am not seeing a star 20 million years ago, because I am seeing it as it is right now. Our confusion over the speed of radio waves, electricity through resistive and capacitive networks, and slow measuring devices are confusing reality. Reality is not defined by our ability to measure it. This is proven by science changing its laws every time a new way to see things is discovered. What is...is.







Julien Landau Picture holding an umbrella in the storm. Fabric too taught it breaks. Too slack and water pools then dumps. The handle too rigid and it snaps, too flexible it won't work. What is the storm? Our Human Nature. What is the umbrella? Our minds. Who holds the Umbrella? Our Sentient Will.







Ron Prussman Now, picture a man in a poncho...wondering why so much effort was put into inventing a complex machine that is less effective, and makes one of your hands become useless.







Ron Prussman lol. What is the poncho? Only what one found was needed to weather the storm. It may be a wall, or a front, or a hand to help another.







Julien Landau Why does the Dragon recur throughout the world, springing up in Literature, Ceramic designss, Paintings, etc.? 1) They once roamed as Dinosaurs and we have ancestral memory. Perhaps it's 2) There were real dragons as we picture them here once and it was recorded in artful ways. 3) Dragonlike creatures visited here, we visited them, or are we are cosmic hybrid decendents of them with apes as MANY cultures, including the priestly and Emperor class of Japan contend (as well as various South American cultures as well as African Nations, etc.). 4) Dragons are a crude and easy imagination, only crossing a snake with a bird. 5) Dragons captivate us as they call to a Mythogenetic Archetype inbred in us. 6) Dragons will exist as one day with splicing we make them. 7) Dragons are ethereal beings existing right beside us yet phase-shifted and we catch glimpses or otherwise sense. 8) Dragons become more real the more we imagine them. 9) Dragons exist in another dimension and we sense them on an unexplainable psychic level, perhaps they are telepathic. 10) Dragons once existed here and though no record remains, their spirit has affected us. 11) Dragons exist beyond time and space in an Aristotlian Heaven. 12) By the right conditions over time with mixing/stacking/matching/evolving, it was inevitable an idea such as Dragon would show up somewhere and it is here. 13) A greater consciousness and our imagination are connected and perhaps a portion of SCR's, in this case the concept of a dragon, exist as they are meant to by various sentient transmissions, more on that later. This Earth is a train station in which we all meet and work out possibilities via physical mental spiritual forms. Instead of looking through SCR induced/tunnel vision/limited definition of possibility and identity/dualistic (either/or) perspective - Nature AND quantum mechanics tell us all possibilities exist here and now as a field. Is it possible the Dragon is real? YES. Yes it is. Perception and imagination have been shown to collapse the waveform. Current grand unified field theory contends that the Universes that give rise to sentience continue, while others do not. The moment we imagine a dragon, we observe it just as much as our observations are needed for the waveforms of possibility fields to collapse into here and now. How different is real from imagined? On a subconscious level we don't distinguish. In fact Indigent Aboriginal Australians hold dreams true and waking state false? Are they incorrect? Here, at this earth juncture, just thinking makes it real etc. and various realities meet here inside us (with our body mind gut instinct, intellect, chakras, energy body, ego, personality etc.) and without (meeting others). When various realities and Dimensions, (real, imaginary, perceived, scr's etc.) are not balanced stryfe occurs. Knowing they all are real, we are less keen to react. We are able to choose what suits the spark within that holds true. We are free to break the chains of limited unaltruistic means and open up to superior Peaceful means.







Ron Prussman I wonder that myself. The dragon is always magical, wise, and out for it's own interests. Europeans seem to be the only ones that actively hunted them, instead of fearing and respecting.







Julien Landau By learning all the arts we open all the channels and dimensions and expand consciousness to include greater means by which to promote harmony and Good will. We must recognise us in the enemy and the enemy in us. Also that we may be the same person swapped had we been born to different SCR's and have compassion for ignorance. They may take our body, can't have the spark. The spark is an Irresistible Force, whose flames are fanned as we find Unity and quell the stryfe with water, for there is a Higher Order, but we have to do it.







Ron Prussman I have entertained the notion that dragons are both the Fallen, and those who visit with purpose. The humans that have spoken with them have always done so in seclusion. It is as though only some can see them, or that only some can handle the truth of what they are. This gets very close to my studies of Biblical figures. Last night it was Enoch. Why would God need to use a man as his voice? Perhaps, because man will only listen to man, and angels must listen to and obey him?







Julien Landau Socially Constructed Realities bind inclusive communities. Some find power within the structure too alluring to consider shaking, as it's working for them. People are rewarded for staying within the construct and fear shunning for stepping outside. An undercurrent of counterculture may be found under the surface, but the surface is on guard (and the cops and robbers game mostly stays within the structure). Modern Child Psychology Researchers have found that it takes ten positive statements to equal one negative statement made to a child, hence the power of social dynamics keeping us in place via fear of shame we then internalize. The id is equivalent to the subconscious (Ku in Kahuna Hawaiian Magik) it is primal/raw/barely intelligent/unrelenting/unapologetic with it's wants desires base emotions etc. The 'Shadow' in Jungian Psychology is a more balanced view as it includes but is not limited to a negative leaning, unattractive primitive bent - but includes morphing into scary wolves with righteous anger and other surreal intriguing archetypal forces (more on that later). The Ego is our intellect. Our name. I know that we reincarnate (I have no interest in proving or converting or discussing that at the moment, though happy to). I bring up reincarnation only to implore myself and others to not confuse our ego/name/intellect in this lifetime as the one and only identity considering it changes every time we reincarnate. Therefore we must find the through-line that is immutable...that spark. The intellect is a difference engine and though we subconsciously perceive much, it is filtered and our conscious perception limits our possibilities. Using our ego identities we follow then create then enforce increasing structures and laws which we internalize and pass on, that is the superego. The id, the ego, the superego make up psychology and, combined with other awareness faculties we can and do develop (more on that later) are influenced by a set of ten forces towards creation of SCR's. The ten forces are 1) Evolution (competition + hostile environment + resource management + mutation and adaptation). 2) Symbiosis. 3) Fulcrum balance points between opposites (with unique relational dynamics, as being a third point to a binary system allowing leverage to tip balances given force). 4) Generative force emanating/transmitted by movement of opposites. 5) Stacking, wherin individual agents in combination both incorporate and are enabled in dimensions greater than the unassembled agents (and the propensity for the coming together). 6) Altruism. 7) Entrainment. 8) Resource management. 9) Power dynamics. 10) Instinctual drives to love to work towards pleasure avoiding pain, the inborn landcapes.







Ron Prussman I like Jung. He didn't insist that my parent's sex lives did more than create me. He also had the same Jungian type that I do, so maybe I just understand him. :)







Julien Landau Jung is an Enduring Hero







Julien Landau i finished the 10 though i forgot 11) Morphogenetic Fields







Ron Prussman I have been exploring a new-age question: After reversing every single rule of arrangement and production, how did dubstep end up being so much better than most of the music that followed the rules?







Julien Landau dumb(step)-founding







Ron Prussman Was that the drop? lol







Ron Prussman My bass doesn't wobble, but it does sway. May have to use a shorter strap.







Julien Landau Why explain with science? It is the final arbiter of real vs. not real in Western society (prove it with science and you have the power of truth/reality in your favor). How did it come to be this way, our narrow attitude and perspective? The Normans and their harsh environment (more on that later). Though I LOVE science it has weaknesses...really!!? YES. In short, statistics and that ol' bell curve is the problem, allow me to elucidate.







Julien Landau First, why not only science? Why an interdisciplinary approach? Raw data is lifeless. Quantitative and sometimes Qualitative analysis is required. From the analysis come hypothesis which are tested to be proved wrong. Coming up with good hypothesis requires imagination and a degree of artfulness, perhaps a 'human's touch'. August Kekulé, who is credited with the discovery of benzene saw a snake eating it's tail (an 'ouroboros') in a dream and woke up knowing the structure that was eluding science. Einstein often cited imagination as a key component of his work process. What is done with the knowledge then is passed to the engineering department. The Philosophy department gets no respect, yet without their influence across the campus, would our human character keep up with the data without imaginative hypothesis? Perhaps, though creativity and imagination can be crudely described as recognizing a pattern in one environment/field/system and placing it over other patterns to compare/contrast/synthesize/analyse/predict behavior in one or both or a third model, perhaps stack the models for new perspectives.







Julien Landau For studies to be valid by the scientific model it must be repeatable,observable and testable. The observation and testing methods must follow guidelines to ensure the exclusion of 'outside' forces not being tested for - that is, gathering/testing (for) data you want (appropriate and uninfluenced by non-appropriate data) while at the same time excluding irrelevant data and/or possible 'outside' effects to the data (known as "the X-Factor"). Employing a "double-blind methodology", for instance, may be one (among other) processes built into the study to ensure proper conduct of experimentation. Repeatable means that under the same conditions, anyone properly repeating the study will get the same or statistically similar results (more on that later). Observable means that given the current state of technology, the study (and that which is being studied) can be observed and studied. Testable is defined by our ability to gather and measure data from the observed phenomenon/pattern/concept etc. It is testable if it is possible to measure against a hypothesis by determining whether the hypothesis has been disproved or not. After many replicated tests disproving a hypothetical statement we have the pot of gold at the end of the Rainbow. From an Epistomological standpoint this is interesting as we find out more and more by increasing our database of what ISN'T true, from which Qualitative/Conceptual/Macro 'conclusions' that satisfy us (enough) are drawn. By becoming experts in a field, a scientist may wind up knowing more and more about not the tree, nor the fruit, nor the seed, but instead garner expertise on the casing/hull of the seed (from the seed of only one type of tree). That is, knowing more and more about less and less.







Julien Landau Intrepid travelers came in from the East with all manner of Spices, Flora, Silks, Fauna, etc., among them Elephants which were not of the region. At once the 6 (though blind) most venerated regents were asked to determine what these Elephants were...at this point no one even knew what to call them! The first five to arrive (representing our senses) tugged a tail and said "what's the big deal, it's rope!". Another, bumping against the tusk proclaims it simply a fancy weapon...and so on. Finally their cousin arrives and hears about the rope and the spears and the tough breathing wall and the trumpet music and in sharing each piece they all laugh realizing the Magnificent Elephant is a Wonderfullyt welcome Beast of Burden to be raised and cared for, left alone, perhaps riden into battle, perhaps a seat for the Monarchy's travels, who knows...it certainly was not rope haha.







Julien Landau What would happen if the Engineering department (rope) and the Military (tusk/spear) etc didn't meet by the water cooler (interdisciplinary studies). How much advancement without lowering our pride ('emptying our cup' as the Chinese proverb goes) when we are sure it's rope, (not a unified whole) with the engineering department CERTAIN it's rope (and has tested whether the tail was rope over and over...and by their database and conclusion, it is rope). Advancement is slower when the left hand doesn't know what the right hand is doing. Alternatively, our increased populace involved in scientific pursuits as well as the advancements in communication, knowledge, and computing processing speed and data capacity has led to exponential leaps via symbiosis of knowledge (the 6th regent) and teamwork the likes of which have never been dreamed...recreating Atlantis at record pace...similar to the technologies employed in earliest Sumerian/Babylonian times having appeared (archaeologically speaking) "overnight" when the societies meeting there synthesized/advanced technology at mind boggling rates as compared to our advancement with tools and technology previously.







Julien Landau The foundational bridge between math and science is Statistics (and statistical analasys following agreed upon rules based on a bell-curve model). You may argue with a person but you can't argue with numbers...because science is related to math, it is incredibly difficult to debate against - as in "just the facts M'am, was it a two or a three". Numbers are clear and specific making an excellent structural base for the advancement of knowledge...a two remains a two regardless...and by quantifying observed phenomenon via the machinations of the scientific process we aim to further understand our world and our place in it with Scientific pursuits....and to make money and iphones (and the 'as seen on tv' plastic gizmo for $19.95), etc...Science! Also, science has been aided by better and better tools and technologies over the ages and science with technology are inevitably paired with one furthering the other cyclically. The historical development of technology has been spured by many historical ( psychogenetic/psychokinetic/morphogenetic/mythogenetic) forces - for example, the Normans had to develop technology, while those in temperate and tropical climates did not (Normans came from ice, snow repeat), and their genetic/cultural line, being predisposed by and towards development (and appropriation/amalgamation of conquered culture's wares) superior technology (and copious amounts of it compared to other cultures) enabled them to conquest swaths of Europe hybridizing and eventually coming to be the Swiss(partly)/Austrian/German/Dutch/Belgian(partly)/English(partly)/French(partly)/a bit Spanish and Italian nation states familial/clanlines as well as Irish and Scottish and of course Nordic countries and other Indo-European Nations have Norman influenced cultural affects/genetic traces etc. (architectural themes showing influence and other effects speak towards this) etc. that have, up until recently held a stranglehold on Science/Technology/Engineering (with the exception of other equally important Nations as well as pockets I will bring up further on), as well as huge global Political, Colonial, Militaristic, Religious, Cultural and Economic power and influence.







Julien Landau The crux of contention...the "sticky hatch", the flaw with understanding our world using only the scientific method (and conclusions drawn from them) is the use of the Bell-Curve Model for the statistical analysis (and synthesis) of data. While studying specific causes/effects etc., data that lay on the peripheral regions of the bell curve are deemed not statistically relevant (for various reasons). The idea is as follows, the bell curve is a 'safe' model for data extraction as, by and large, effects on the outside peripheral are taken to be attributable to x-factors/invariable effects such as discrepancies in the fine tuning of tools used in the process etc., while the data found 'in' or 'near' the middle (extending wider to outlaying start and end points)to wide region (depending on the study) are relevant. Data on the peripheral sometimes are not even included in the charts and data pools etc used to understand the data vs. the hnypothesis...it doesn't fit and it's not used. If data falls exactly in the middle, depending on the study, it may be called 'true' and the further out one goes, the more the data reaches a threshold where, by being not statistically significant it sums up to a notion of 'false' (for the particular study. The data at the edges (spaces 0 and 100 on X axis of the model would be at the edges) is neither true nor false it is extraneous and irrelevant towards that study. It may be great data for another study, just not that one, and will likely not make it further than an intern's viewing (as the data gets passed up and through the process and chain of command/order of operations). Also, while collecting data, data and phenomenon observed that does not fit within the boundary/structures/technologies of the tools used to gather and/or is outlying and extraneous to the means or aim of the study, it is deemed not on the Bell-Curve and therefore not (at all) significant (statistically or qualitatively). Such observed data and phenomenon can not and does not ever appear in the study. My Statistics professor at UCSC described it as follows: "If you are measuring whether mice enter or do not enter a mousetrap when a UFO lands in the next field, you may not include mention of the UFO. You may ask for a grant to study the UFO that was seen. You may not, however, report it in any way in, or associated with, the mouse-trap study. If the outlaying field, (and whatever may-or-may-not land or otherwise occur there) has already been deemed not to be an X-factor (during the constructive/theoretical phase of the experiment - that is before the experiment is run). By excluding observed phenomenon and data we are limiting our psychosensory 'peripheral' vision/scope/stacking advancement abilities. As far as science is concerned the UFO never landed as it is not repeatable, observable (again) or testable AND it happened so far off the Bell-Curve it's hogwash anyways...soooo...like the men in black urge citizens, the UFO never landed. We must incorporate science unified with all perceptive means and ways for a clearer picture. We will do better to accept the possibility the UFO landed (having seen it), and for all we know it was interested in the mouse-trap and DID affect the study, just in ways our tools can't measure. Empirical (direct sensory observation and recall) knowledge - aka 'a posteriori' knowledge is not valid in the framework of quantitative/'Hard' scientific disciplines (physics, mathematics, astronomy, biology etc.). 'Hard sciences' hold higher influence/sway and are what we have used to determine what, (without question) is real (and what can be used to further technology and engineering. The 'Soft Sciences' include Sociology, Psychology, Anthropology, etc.).







Julien Landau Also, raw data requires interpretation to be useful. As demonstrated earlier science helps validate what we know to be false, yet the conclusions, until further testing (and more further testing) require conclusions...human conclusions...working models we call theories. When theories continue to accurately 100% predict future outcomes for 50 to 200 years they become 'canonized' as "Scientific Law", that is, little to no further research can be done in that line of reasoning by Scientific means.







Julien Landau By excluding observed phenomenon and data we are limiting our psychosensory 'peripheral' vision/scope/stacking advancement abilities. For example, Artificial Intelligence researchers, using an 'evolutionary' approach/model written into a software program found a strange result, which I will get to. An evolutionary based model program works as follows: defined units/modules/agents/possibilities/models/outcomes, (let's call them modules), go through 'Phase 1'. Set within a range of subroutines each employing one or more of the same/similar even different algorythms (fancy ways of compiling yes and no statements) pass a master load balancing/signal input/output control mechanism (today the CPU does this in our computers) that then finishes Phase 1 by deeming what "works" when it passes the cpu. What works is what fit the parameters of the desired outcome for Phase 1. Modules (etc.) that do not fit the parameters (they do not "work") are placed aside. Phase 2 allows the modules that passed succesfully through Phase 1 to continue through another similar set of environmental paramenters (in the form of yes and know statements grouped together as 'subroutines'/algorythms if pure mathematics are involved). By running ('cycling') the software researches aimed to mimik evolution (as the final product of evolution is always the most elegant solution for it's environment/niche). What the team found (will cite this article further on) was that, after having run a simulation in which any and all configurations of a circuitboard would be made, (using a limited number of 'parts' that were virtual models of real electrical components/capacitors/transistors etc. - with all the necessary guidelines as to how such parts can and can not fit/function having been encoded), was then run trillions of times ('cycles') and the resulting recommended circuitboard...the conclusion of all the evolutionary cycles, was then itself physically fashioned and tested. Built using actual parts the circuitboard, though extremely efficient (as the software had been coded to produce), an extraneous part was noticed by the team right away. It wasn't connected or attached to the rest of the circuitboard. The board was then fashioned with real components only this time omitting the seemingly;y unnecessary part. The original board, odd piece and all, outperformed the second board they built!? It turns out resonant frequencies were dampened by the component allowing greater cooling off of capacitors that were connected, a 'heat sync'. Therefore, extraneous is important. All details must be accounted for for our advancement. If a UFO lands in a Forest, and it doesn't fit the Bell-Curve or observed correctly/scientifically, does it make a sound?







Julien Landau Last week, a Harvard professor made the news when he managed to have a study (a 'paper') composed of gibberish, with the inane text having been fashioned by random text generating-software (called 'RandomTextGenerator'), published in 11 respected scientific journals. He paid them to publish the paper proving that entry of disinformation into scientific journals can be bought. After completion of a study, it is only when journals deem the study worthy enough to include in their catalog of articles that the study gains traction, being then published in more wider read, well established/respected/older journals, and so on. Eventually the articles, as printed in the journals, make their way to politicians, proletariats, professionals (in related fields), policymakers, engineers and Craftspeople/Tradespeople/Industrialists as proof for their cause or grant request or policy decisions. We also incorporate what we hear into our superego - that voice of reason/law/society dictating valid measure from wild goose chases, the crux of SCR's power over our minds, especially within our society that has been of majority Norman, scientifically bent citizens to encourage and be encouraged by Science can not be understated, for what is truth and what is real is largely dictated by which article has the most approval (whether a new or old article/study being the proof of what is right). As laypeople not directly involved in the study, it is rare the conclusions of studies can or are properly understood, as it takes years of information processing and education to get to the level that the researchers conducting the study are, and much gets lost in the translation. Unless one learns advanced mathematics, quantitative hard sciences will be out of reach to the policymakers. Unless, cross disciplinary academic approaches are then employed to further clarify what the results seem to suggest using a regular joe vocabular (one that doesn't use theoretical or otherwise advanced mathematics). That takes the correct conditions. All of these variables, these gaps and weaknesses add up to suggest the scientific model is excellent, not perfect and we must embrace all the means available to us through the ages including but not limited to dancing audio visual arts yoga etc. to get a more wholistic and clear as well as usefull grand unified picture/theory of our field of perception as we Live the 'Fantastically BLESSED and WONDERFUL Human Condition. Knowing our place is instinctual given the level of pattern recognition abilities we have developed into various forms of intelligence over immesearable millenia of peace and stryfe/struggle with environment and by embracing only science we oft leave said arts behind.







Julien Landau Arts, knowledge and technologies lost (partly or entirely) to the ages are many, yet some archaic means of perception and practice are being revived, many of which are rewarding (to the point, I believe, that the word 'rewarding' is such an understatement that it does not suffice). Getting lost to the ages occurs by means of (in the name of) Churches/Religions/Cults, Science (as an accepted standard for reason), 'Public good'/Policy/Law and the Policymakers, National Security Advisers/Military/Police and/or Cultural Entropy (dwindling resources/plague/bad policies/war/famine/willing or unwilling amalgamation into another culture, etc.). What has been lost? 1) Cultures. 2) Languages and oral traditions. Languages largely define culture. The oral tradition that once held cultures together was weakened and ensuing cultures defined and maintained by oral tradition were weakened when book-making materials and technologies were discovered and spread. Starting with papyrus and quill to bible producing monasteries using factory assembly line techniques to the enactive/disruptive technology of the printing press. From fire signal watchtowers to carrier pigeons and horseback couriers, to trade routes (land and sea), woodblock etching stamping/printing on hemp rag and linen canvas and cotton rag, etching/lithograph. From longsheets (ancient woodblock community 'newspapers') to the printing press to books and magazines by disenfranchised and/or independent authors to telegraph poles to underwater cable-lines for market ticker tape, to airmail and steamship mail and telephones to Internet. Early Cave etchings and paintings (airstraw/hand/brush), early sculptures, structures, markings such as Cuneiform and Hieroglyphics. Early Alphabets. Early Mapmaking. Divination tools. Navigation tools. Carts and Chariots, ships and rockets, slings and arrows to daggers and missles. Technologies are enactive and disruptive forces. The Book made it such that anyone could learn, eventually overarching SCR structures such that Social constructs such as the Catholic Church eventually could no longer keep a monopoly on information. At first , with oral tradition societies, only the priestly class and elders had the benefit of authority over the Nations' stories, culture and ethics. 3) Much Herbology and Medicinal plant use was lost when the Witches were burned. 4) How the



Incan Temples, such as Qorikancha the "temple of the sun" in Peruvian province of Cusco, were built with precision modern engineers have difficulty replicating, including 0.0 degree variance of distance between and around window structures inside.







Julien Landau How and what do we see? How and what do we know? What other perspectives complement, yet are different than the scientific model that is of use to us?







Julien Landau Our lives feel like a narative, a story. It has character and if the adage "as above, so below" holds true, does our character also reflect a higher order? Who are we if not the ones seeking perfection of character. Reaching homeostasis withoin and without, perhaps self actualizing to higher stacked potentials.







Julien Landau Are our thoughts actions attitudes deeds adaptive or maladaptive or do we consistently plan and manage outcomes adaptively? Adaptiveness rests on the ability to be flexible in mind speach action awarness and adjusting to everchanging environments and patterns. By being rigid in our SCR's we aquire maladaptive attitudes, means, laws, trends, social expectations as we are no longer flexible. We expect others and ourselves and society to be a certain way to act a certain way as dictated by the SCR's and that is neither flexible nor adaptive. SCR's, when working on closed loop/circular logic may become stagnant and perhaps eventually collapse under the weight of flawed rational/mass hysteria etc. (an unstable model of rationale vs. every increasing natural counterbalances). My Professor in a Philosophy class (studying Kant's works) told the following story: word had come back to Spain that three brother monks were not taking the Eucharist and Padre Fernando was dispatched to their monestary on the tropics. Quickly greeted by the brothers upon arrival, he was taken aback by their shody robes and wild hair and eyes. They danced towards him and he feared Lucifer's work. The brothers spin in a circle holding hands, motioning to the Padre to join, to which he does not, as they sing in silly childlike manner "Happy three, happy three we be three happy three." then scampered off like wood nymphs or a sort of satyr/pan Greek mythological like character. Poor Padre Fernando spends 3 months patiently going over and over again the basics of correct behaviour/prayer, etc. He only stays so long as the climate is kind and the voyage was and will be long. He longs for his Seminary in Toledo and packs his Rosarry, his clothes, his cross, his journals etc and bids the monks good bye. They hardly notice as he boards the ship as they are occupied with their incessant silly song and prancy circle dance "happy three..." If he has to hear it one more time, Santa Maria, he may sin in more than mind give strength he calls to Jesus, Lord and Saviour then grumbles asking help on his voyage from patron Saints of Voyage and of his namesake and the like, nervously counting rosary beads in his hoit sweaty clutch. 1 day out to sea and he dreads telling his Monseigneire' Bishop Fredrico he failed to make monks out of them and they can not be saved, they are more animals now that they have been too far from society. He also can't wait to tell the monks, his friends some of the highlights so they can comiserate, laugh and have sneak a round of mead in celebration of his return, hear how stands the Monestary etc. The good Padre, leaning over the edge for the Sunset views in the twighhlight haze a boat, it comes fast and hard to make out as a ghost and before yelling to crew exclaiming to Santa Maria, it's the three monk brothers! They float as they which him "Bon Voyage! Happy Trinity! Happy Fernando Three!" and dissapear. It was then he understood, three was Trinity. They had found the way to Christ. Not the right way, but their way. He vowed then and there to nver tell a soul what happened on the Island. Efficient/successful/flexible/adaptive SCR's. The punchline to the story is that Padre Frederico was promoting an SCR that was rigid and hence maladaptive. The three monks illustrate a flexible and adaptive model. Both models had the same aim - Unity with Christ/cleansing of sin/atonement for sin/gratitude to the Father the Son the Holy Spirit and all forms of Trinity Unified therein as Christ.







Julien Landau Are SCR's bad? Of course not. Imagine one's Life or the world as magnetic rod you hold in your left hand.... the left side of the pole you are holding is 'Good' and the right side is 'Bad' and you cut the bad side off and let it fall to the ground. Now we are left holding still a magnetic pole with a good side on left and bad on right. However now it is shorter and the magnetic fields are weaker. We were unsuccesful of getting rid of the bad via surgical excision, and harmed the patient by limiting the world view/perspective range (the size of the pole) as well as the willpower/magnetic strength of the good and the bad within the patient, the Life Force, and it was a bad call. SCR's are neither good nor bad, they are either adaptive or maladaptive for the individual, for society for the ecosphere (and for the interplay between the three).







Julien Landau How do we choose the right SCR's? First we must be able to choose. A slave does not choose. Those born indoctrinated into closed loop exclusive SCR's do not choose. A free agent chooses. One must climb up and help those around them climb up (part of climbing up includes altruism) Maslowe's hiearchy of needs - with each rung an exponentially higher level of personal and interpersonal freedom ever closer towards free agency. Some find Jesus. Some follow a Buddhist practice by neither worshiping, nor not-worshiping Deity as Buddhists believe Deity can not be conceived well enough to worship properly and by following a path of meditation and harmonious action including daily altruism and observation practitioners aim to meet Deity and deliver the message of Heart directly by clearing ignorance/ego/delusion/invalid and unviable SCR's standing in the way. In the moment monks aim to be completely open and real and sincere and pure without judgement or fear in front of a fire without burning as there is no mind/ego/falseness to burn (only the original state, 'prima mater'). It is a surrender into Unity with Joy, though it is a difficult path as we can not cut evil/bad from one end and good from the other, we are human. One must over or under or through or sidestep the pole of good and bad by incorporating the pole, making Peace with the nature of the pole and choosing alignment of all the spheres and fields - Chakras and arts and vibrations etc. with one's inner nature, with the nature of the world at large, nature etc.. There are many ways to choose the right SCR's and for starters don't choose indoctrination into closed loop systems that espouse limiting beliefs. A Freudian Psychotherapy is just as successful as Primal Scream Therapy or Jungian Analysis or Rebirthing or Hypnotherapists or Art Therapists...why? It's the therapist, not the practice they chose that makes the difference. It's not the color, but what is in a Baloon that makes it rise. SCR's that espouse limiting one's range of/capability for perception, action, thought is not only dangerous for the individual, but for society given the likely chance said SCR has built within it's logic that it must proselytise/promote/force others to step in line via subversive or subtle to coercive means (including well constructed means of deceptive and hypnotic psychology, more on that later).







Julien Landau Binary Patterns (sun up, sun down, for instance) are reacted to by binary sensors (primitive photoreceptive 'eyes' for instance). Hundreds of millions of years later the system has grown more complex, all based on the binary code and chemicals that structure/pattern/react to patterns, all binary. Everything is binary. Hot cold, up down, left right, awake asleep, happy sad, rich poor, good bad, near far, on off, yes no, light dark, clean dirty, fun boring, worthwhile not worthwile so many decisions every day, how can one find Peace?







Mikey Patterson are you debating with someone that blocked me?.... or are you just yapping away? lol







Julien Landau Neither







Mikey Patterson ok...







Julien Landau I come in Peace







Mikey Patterson i bite 3:)







Julien Landau I embrace all people's animals religions nations attitudes







Julien Landau I care only for wisdom and Peace







Julien Landau however it finds me or i find it i welcome both and hope to share forward that sense







Mikey Patterson i got to be much more tired than this... to hold this convo with you man :)







Julien Landau as you wish







Julien Landau Studies indicate we are much more affected by Cyclical Natural Patterns not of our choosing. For instance, during and after a lean winter, more Female Deer are born and reared. Rich men have more sons than daughters. These are all based on statistically significant numbers (variance of +/- 16 from midpoint/center of the Bell-curve is what is considered a significant (and valid) 'hit' of data when measured against the pre-writen results the researchers were looking for (as such hits of data in the middle of the curve indicate a successful experiment). The pre-written data the real world gathered/observed data that it is measured against is based on a hypothesis meant to disprove what an observed effect can not be. Eventually by this means we limit what the structure or phenomenon can not be until left with, what, hopefully we can discern it is. This is difficult with effects such as gravity and other fields. For starters, we must learn (as well as learn how to accept what we find about ourselves and others...a bold leap of faith) in terms of what we don't know. Being rigid and convinced of my SCR, I will not be able to allow myself the privilege and possibility of considering (given my giant/self aggrandizing/self fulfilling/ego/stubbornness/pride/morality/ethics/drives/wants/needs/purpose/aim/attitude) that I am wrong, that my SCR is wrong that others who agree with my SCR are, by proxy, wrong. That things are not day or night right and wrong black and white. My stance is correct as I was told it was correct as they learned from a scroll or tradition that proves it is the only correct scroll or tradition with engaging stories/rites of passage/threat of ostricising from a (humanly needed sense of ) community, etc. First the pattern and photoreceptor aided our primitive aquatic plant/jellyfish microscopic earthly ancestor (Adam and Eve represent Real/Spiritual Being(s), not here yet in Eden from which we descended via Cain, Able and the Sons of Perdition, and more on that later). Eventually we come to choose and construct our patterns and tools to make more patterns and tools. The patterns that led here followed efficient use of gathering maintaining transforming and expelling resources while reproducing patterns that reproduced of the same or similar nature (difference being gamma and other cosmic rays knocking portions of DNA code hence altering the ensuing phenotype that now must find it's mate who had the same or similar gene affected by Gamma or other cosmic rays and that the enactive/disruptive DNA alteration/mutation was adaptive as well as not impeding their ability to reproduce with a line that is either a little or a lot different in it's phenotype to continue the line. The fact is we are all mutations/forms of our combined ancestors, but that is not as relevant as examining, at this moment, our primitive ancestral structures, sleuthing for Wholistic yet Dynamic adaptive systems we can apply as SCR's here and now i9n our daily lives, once we learn the tools of Peace. We are EVERYTHING and there is no 'We', only 'Are', and this is the higher teaching of Unity Mind (please see my previous write up 'Gravity Wave Meditation'. Higher teaching in that one must endeavour to see with the Spiritual Eye. Please allow me to explain. One must choose the SCR's with exact precision (and make micro-adjustments to the said model we choose for ourselves). The tiny jellyfish systems that continued were efficient. There was a 'Bio-Logic' where what came out was equal to or more than what came out. How could it be more than what goes in? By stacking...put airplane wheels with airplane wings and bolts and an engine and now the energy of fuel that goes in and that fuel plus the restructured/arranged stack travels further expels more is affected by and affects more within and without it's environment than had the parts lay separate. The airplane needs a pilot. That pilot better be sober. Also, a bird whose wings now longer than his father's better catches airstreams and expells less energy flapping it's wings while hunting. Ever stacking increasing sytems each at 'Quantum Levels' 'higher' than before. A Quantum Leap refers to the jump of an electron from one valence shell to another. In between the electron - for all we are able to observe - does not exist (only to then re-appear at a different level of orbit). By taking a leap of faith we are like that electron, we must clear our being and mind attitude of preconceived notions and daringly with goodwill leap into the unknown scary void that looks empty only to find it looks black because it contains all the colors and it's hard to see because, being all the colors it is that brilliant white that blinds us, when all colors form white. We don't see black, it's just another color (all the colors). We don't see white, it's just another color (all the colors). As light in the form of wave and/or photon strikes an object, the resonant frequency of the object as related to the visible end of the light spectrum, takes on the pattern of vibration fof the object (measured in Angstroms) and hits our retina. Depending on the angstrom frequency we measure it's color. The jump of the electron from one sp-variable/valence shell/orbit is measured in Planck units, named after Maxwell Planck. Plancks are the smallest unit of measure and mathematical models dictate there can not be a smaller unit of measure. Atoms and electrons may only move one planck unit at a time (as we are able to measure) indicating motion is not smooth and fluid yet occurs in stages.







Julien Landau Any military tactition will tell you, to be in a higher plane/orbit than your enemy is a superior position. Similarly by making a quantum leap from a common, easy, preprogrammed or otherwise maladptive SCR to one aligned with our higher self and ethics we effect the patterns of our lives as they were before the jump with leverage from a more efficient/dynamic/wholeistic vantagepoint from our new orbit to our previous manner and means. Neanderthals were found frozen on top of coal they didn't know could be lit. Vikings would starve before eating fish as, to their SCR the fish were beneath them. We don't know what we don't know but closed loop SCR's do not allow us to explore even the notion that not all is known as all that is known is from and proven by a static scroll or tradition that spreads and indoctrinates and is violently repressive to any who question and/or show signs of individuation, resistance to indoctrination, alternate debate, civility, humanity, greater wholistic altruism. The Stanley Millgram experiments combined with the Ralph Zimbardo sociological experiments show us two things. One, we do what authority tells us. Two, given the opportunity, we promote authoritive systems. Regardless if said authority or authoritative system is counter to altruism, or even based on any foundation of reason...all it took were researchers in labcoats telling subjects what to do and the subjects soon revealed the ugliest sides of human nature. Break Free Brothers and Sisters!







Julien Landau You will know when you are on the right path and have chosen the best SCR's when little victories build upon little victories moreso than little defeats building upon little defeats. The first are marks of efficient/viable/sustainable systems/SCR's. It takes moments of assesment and observation as well as re-evaluation, as well as being on the lookout for synchronicities and dynamic synergies.







Julien Landau The right SCR must be chosen based on it's viability/efficient gathering-use-transformation-expelling of resources/repeatable/reproducable/stackable allowing for expansion/fair/balanced. Look to biological models as mother nature does it best. Look inside with the spiritual eye, what drives you moves you, what compells you? Can we trust our thoughts/intellect to choose the SCR's? Emotions? Body Mind/Chakras? What others found and passed to us? Like the pole of good and evil the answer to each is yes and no. Further analysis and synthesis is done when we empty and clear our minds...not so much that our brains fall out, enough to not be stubborn and think we know it all allowing us to be receptive. Then we sit and listen patiently, perhaps walk in the woods. A walkabout, a quest to find spirit, one's spirit and the greater spirit we live in. Examine who does the examining then let go and observe the wind and cycles of waves and tides, eat when hungry laugh when happy find the spirit when you feel good and say kind things and sleep well and are able to love and to work ever increasingly better as you tailor the SCR's to match the spirit as you find it. There is not a lot of time to find it, better you assume you already feel are aquainted with and know your spirit as yopu do, one can not and does not lkive without it, it is the essence and fulcrum







Julien Landau We are born with bodies and minds of specific subsets, the idea being that gene pool variance ensures probability of survival as environmental changes favor older less prominent genes now when before they were a liability to the species. For instance, there are genetic markers that predict whether a citizen votes conservative or votes liberal.







Julien Landau We are born with our body that of it's own mind sustains us (we don't regulate our heartbeat and breathing consciously). Also we have our higher reasoning and cognitive function, the intellect. We have emotional and feeling states as part of our experience and they can be compared to a form of intelligence. Five more fields are counted when we add the stomach with it's multiplex of signal processing that is often refered to as a mind. Then there are the Chakras, eight in total each tuning us by different energetic conscious states and means. An ethereal and Astral body inhabits and is us. We have blood memory and energy fields from opur ancestors. We have parasites and symbiotes in the form of the flora and fauna in our stomach that affect our decisions (more on that later). We have an internal narative regarding our wants, needs, hopes, desires that we associate with our name and our physical appearance. We have a social self that may or may not be entirely sincere nor an accurate portrayal of who we are. We have an irresistable attunement for certain rhythms and frequencies such as music. We also are born with instinct which we learn to understand and chanel to synchronise with our environment. We may find words of others or songs that we don't like that get stuck. We may be surprised when we are convinced we are this and don't like that, when we have now learned that that...isn't so bad...so maybe we aren't this but that. We are born to cultures of SCR's and natural as well as SCR forces. SCR's are conceptual and only Nature is real, as 'the proof is in the pudding'. Yes we are a force of nature, yet we overcome instincts and are the only animal that does this as we have the added benefit of artificial constructs/SCR's. Now to the one perceiving (in) an SCR it is real and has real effects. Compared to natural laws does it still hold up as real? Is it in harmony/efficient/balanced? Is it something an animal shares or understands?







Julien Landau There are various natural forces to consider. Just as the deer with more fawns and the rich human Fathers genberating more sons and women's menstruations being synchronized and affected by tidal phases, moon phases, and nearby women (via hormone interchange) we are connected to, affect and are effected by invisible forces. We can't see Gravity, we don't have to believe it's real, it doesn't care...the speed of light/gravity/Planck's constant/relativity/polarity/energy-matter-energy/relativity all are constant.







Julien Landau In the 1960's was an engineer watching a gameshow who noticed a pattern in the element of the game where lights flashed on rewards or challenges in a seemingly random way. In fact everyone assumed it was random whein it was not. He made the news after being the longest standing contestant with earnings that made the tv execs nervous. When his system for continued wins was determined, though he was kicked off the show he had broken no laws. He was rewarded for thinking and acting above the known perspective.







Julien Landau Various traditions, including our own, speak of an Ancestral, personal, Angelic spirit that sits on your shoulder (European cultures a devil on the other shoulder). Your choice is to listen to the Angelic voice or not, and the more you follow that voice the stronger it becomes.







Julien Landau Why do I speak of ghosts and spirits and higher selves and all manner of unscientific entities. Am I a hippie? New age? Am I serious or are they analogies? Am I Christian? Buddhist? A Raver? Sane? A diluded armchair scientist fanning at imaginary flames and tilting at windmills? A pagan? Do I believe in maintaining a military and how would I jibe that with being a Pacifist? When I speak of my Spirit or yours, what am I talking about? Furthermore, among the various interconnected and interelated systems that make up our human experience, what means and which voices speak to a higher reason aligned with our spirits?







Julien Landau With our biological drives needs wants desires meshed with equally compelling calls for sense and civility not to mention dreamscapes and visions, the balancing act of earning money and just getting by, how if ever does one or anyone find Peace? I feel more than any of these words may express. Perhaps emotions speak volumes. Perhaps pictures are worth a thousand words. Words help to discern just and true from illusion for eventually after debate and consideration it is inevitable we surpass our aim, even if our aim has changed and surprised us. My aim is to express what I feel, what I sense, what I have learned to the best of my ability, the reasons why are many and I care not to explain. One thing is true, nothing is as it seems and everything changes, (even change) and perhaps some day with a Grand Collective Unified return to SourceMind even delusion ('nothing is as it seems') will dissolve to Ocean of Purity and Possibility. Fortunately we have been given the ability to sit patiently and listen.







Julien Landau By it's nature Spirit is elusive ethereal ephemeral hard to pin down and difficult to measure and explain. That does not make it impossible to measure or explain, etc. Which SCR we choose and how we employ them must be chosen by our Spirit. You will know you have made a correct decision when you body and stomach feel well and your hackles are down, you are easygoing and those around you are not harmed and perhaps even helped by your disposition and actions. When in a reactive and angry state rarely are good decisions made or words of value spoken. One must commit to learn and introspect sources of one's reactivity in hopes of changing patterns that are hurtful to oneself and others. Each variation of our personality (of which there are many), from the happy gal (or guy) to the intellectual to the party animal to the gal who doesn't care to the one who just wants to be left alone to the one who cares too much what others think and have stayed too long fussing with hair and screw them anyways to the internal personality wanting fame fortune...no deserves diamond rings with gold chained tennis bracelets and yaghts and the other personality, meanwhile is yelling "I am so tired I want to watch a movie", only it doesn't stop there as now it would rather read a book. All the voices mentioned qualify as ego as they include the word/concept "I". When we worry about the above concepts, we are worrying about the integration between "I" and the SuperEgo's view of society, and what our parents and friends and neighbors think. Meanwhile our autonomic nervous system and subconscious body mind and subconscious/Id (all the same entity, part of us) are sleeping, hungry, horny, tense, craving care and social comforts and the like. Our emotions, being irrational by definition vary in terms of coming and going unexpectedly with varying duration and intensity. Our environments provides more or less of varying inputs, data and resources. We learn from experience and begin to use memories to help solve problems as well as anticipate as well as tailor future outcomes.







Julien Landau Using the academic disciplines of theoretical physics and Mathematics (employing mathematical models to test new theoretical physics models by proving or disproving the models), two physicists (each in their own and different era) discovered and wrote about Black holes (the first known discovery was written in unpublished works that were not found until decades later, more on that later). After having been theorized and proven black holes are not only possible but likely, the hunt was on to find black holes. You can't observe a black hole, only it's effect on it's surroundings. Fields of various nature tend to be difficult to observe as they occur not as tangible objects. Typically one observes a field by seeing effects on objects (or energy states of various nature) passing near/across/through them. We found black holes and now understand them to be anchor like centers of galaxies. Though we see light missing in regions, as well as gravitational effects from a mass (in this case, anti-mass) in the region the black hole remains unobservable by direct measures.







The spirit can be observed by seeing it's effects within each field that, assembled and working in unison, make the human experience. For instance when you catch yourself thinking and wonder who is thinking about thinking and then a voice calls your name saying 'cut it out' and you chuckle to yourself...the 'yourself' part offers a semantic/intellectual glimpse/notion of one's Spirit. When watching a Disney movie and you well up with tears that are neither joy nor sadness (using emotion), the shadow/glow/peripheral view of the spirit/spark can be observed. When you think of someone from long ago and they call right then (this works via a subconscious communication, like moths with pheromones we have a field that connects our subconsciousness's called the collective unconscious aka morphogenetic field, more on that later), more evidence of spirit/spark is observed.







We input/receive Trillions upon Trillions of bits of data every day. Our intellect is the primary means by which we filter extraneous data allowing pertinent information to be passed and focused upon by the same conscious/identity. That which appears in our peripheral vision has less likelihood of being filtered and oft we are able to catch subtle movements we wouldn't otherwise notice (changing temperatures slow unfurling a plastic bag in a room corner for instance...too slow to see when looking directly). We trust our consciousness for it's perceptive abilities. In the 'Basketball Gorilla' experiment we see eyewitness accounts are approximately 30% accurate. The study goes as follows - subjects are asked beforehand to count how many baskets the white team scores vs. the blue team. A minute into the gameplay an intern in a Gorilla suit comes through a door steps under the hoop, shakes her/his hands and wiggles a bit then runs off the screen. The lights are turned on and subjects are asked not how many points the teams made (people do very well on that part), yet are instead asked who noticed the gorilla suited intern walk out and shake then walk off-screen and only 27-33% of subjects see it. The intellect tends to find itself conflicted by balancing new data and matching with SCR's while maintaining an identity by judging between the various voices. Observing, filtering, judging using data that may or may not be false as well as our perception that may or may not be accurate leads to static/internal and external strife. Only in finding the real or best voice/directive can we stand a chance among competing SCR's within and without.







Competing personalities (that, amalgamated with memory, comprise us) are vying for attention, each with a logic that may (or may not) follow logic from other personalities - making the act of deciding a somewhat stressful task at times. In the book and film '2001 a Space Odyssey' by Arthur C. Clark, H.A.L 9000 gets confused. HAL is a robot in charge of the mission. The purported mission is one set of instructions. Unfortunately poor HAL was given a secret set of instructions causing the conflict to rupture his stability and psychotically decide to destroy the crew, as any good powerful robot should do in movies. The lesson is to prevent conflicting directives as well as place measures to ensure that such conflicts cease and desist for future reference.







We can trust intellect very much and very well, yet not entirely. The same is true of emotions and emotive states (emotions are irrational and are unstable as they come and go, yet they point to one's Truth). What is the Truth then, inside us if not for intellect and emotive wisdom and intelligence. What is the Truth outside?







Julien Landau You can "change your mind". Your body changes to grow (and constantly changes with every breath). Emotions change in the short to long term (expanding with maturity, for example). If for instance, at once all three components of mind/body/emotions radically changed and we found ourselves with a mind so very changed, we even believed we have a different name, and furthermore our emotional states, all of a sudden are 'out of character' (going for instance from being chronically depressed and introverted to suddenly a stable happy extrovert) with on top of everything we find our bodies are of a different sex and age....what then? Who are we? This scenario leaves Spirit as the immutable throughline carrying us and carried by us being that 'thing', that spark, that true identity, that elusive yet ever-presently-felt field of thought/feeling/Bioelectric/psychokinetic-energy that is both the amalgamation of those three (mind, body, emotions) yet not entirely the three.







Julien Landau The Occipital Lobe takes raw sensory data from our eyes and reverses the fuzzy image and employs what neuroscientists call "a Bag of Tricks" to quickly recognize patterns of faces and fire, specifically as well as other quick assessment mechanisms before the same input data is processed by other, slower meachanisms in the Ocipital regionm of the brain. Chemical patterns structuring and interacting with environmental patterns led to us having eyes and the lobe to correct and analyze the data by searching for/being attuned to patterns. Pattern recognition is a physical process, and the brain is a Reality generating engine (as without a perceiver, reality exists as energy yet ceases to be solid and real, as evident by experiments in Quantum Mechanics in which waveform fields collapsed into a singular structure upon observation, having been proven to be immaterial before observation). The brain, being wired with Trillions of Neural connections creates the structural foundation of one's reality by itself, yet 'you' have to be the one to reflect and put what voices and data and perceptions the brain finds and relays in order to use for one's aim and purpose, with intention being the key to self actualization. Aim, purpose, intention all are guids pointing to the Fulcrum, the generative immutable Spark of Spirit. An SCR may be resourceful and efficient with exceelent viability but if, say a career, for instance does not speak to a higher self/real self/spirit in you/is you then it is not likely going to be a rewarding career, rather than one using talents and skills that come with ease in which coworkers admire your easygoing temperment. An SCR working to manage resources can mean that driving 5 hours each way to work for less money than the gas required makes no financial sense and is only viable were the endeavor supported by other means and promises and symbiotic networking that furthers careers and other financial endeavors not related to the 9-5 job we commute 10 hours a day to. With an SCR appealing and flatering one's ego perhaps enacting joyful states yet causing emotional distress to those around you must be evaluated for it is also untenable at face value. When the SCR is truthful, valuable and in line with natural ways as well as one's principle and spirit one is helped in the career by more ability to endure minor setbacks as the spirit drives just as a fire is hot and makes you jump. The pleasure principle has one approiach pleasure avoiding pain yet does not account for the Religious or Spiritual experience that transcends said duality (mystics performing impossible physical feats such as passing metal skewers without drawing blood, pushing people from across a room, healing others using Reiki and laying of hands, regular folks inexplicable suddendly psychically knowing things, subjects affecting seemingly random isotope decay patterns in an experiment done in the 70's, subjects knowing when they are being watched as a recent Stanford experiment shows, etc.).







Julien Landau As with the little Ancestral Angel that rests on your shoulder, the more you find, let out and go with the Spirit the more it feeds and grows to a point where you have a good vantage point outside the cluttered busy mind and the varying emotions even control over the body as well as instincts. Given an absence of real or perceived pain/threat to prod it, nor a stimulus and reward at the end, an animal is unlikely to counter it's instincts. Wrangling a housecat to run across flames and a long path of glowing coals without stimulus in the forms of threat or great reward, the cat in all likelyhood simply won't go. Humans will. The autonomic nervous system in charge of digestion/circulatory/respitory/hormonal etc. systems can not be purposefully, consciously manipulated under regular conditions. Yogis are able to allow the pulse in the left arm to increase while encouraging pulse in the right arm to decrease, something so primary our bodies could not allow us control yet ways are found to control the mind the body and instincts. The final frontier being the spirit, with control of the mind body and instincts as the ticket to said control.







Julien Landau By definition religious experience occurs outside ordinary 'profane' experience and people observe and report the elements of the experience as 'sacred'. A vast variety of religious experience has been documented through the ages. Though the first scientists, being alchemists quested for material and sipritual/religious advancement in their research and practice, time well separated church state and science. Science has explained religious experience as chemical reactions in the brain, as self delusion, as self hypnotised or otherwise implanted false memories, as hypnotised or influenced by outside agents (people, media, drug interference, ergot fungus on bread, unknown dosing by nefarious or accidental means via interactions of medicine climate medical conditions and the like to cause feverish type hallucinations and mass hypnosis even mass hysteria are cited as means to explain religious phenomenon. There are money prizes by skeptics to those who will prove esp and other psychic and noncorporeal conscious phenomenon. One's preconceived notions and one's personal experience will not convince a skeptic as those means are not scientific. Meanwhile, time and again esp has been shown to be a real effect in well respected universities across the globe for decades. In fact, the US Army has poured millions of dollars in evaluating the use of psychics as operatives. Psychics have long worked with sheriffs and other police forces here and across the globe to solve cases. It has been shown that the likelyhood of psychic phenomenon occuring as an effect in a test subjects influence over outcomes outside of physical means to effect are significantly less able to perform feats of esp. Perhaps the psychic's will is at odds with the skeptic's will on an unseen field betwix'd them with one party or another winning with each pushing their sense of reality what can and will be.







Julien Landau Dream of being a king? an empress? fall to base instincts be a warlord? A hero? Being monarchy/Emperor Class/C.E.O's require vast political and economic resources to place one there. Warlord is not advantageous as survival rates tend to be low and the system, aside from harming others in not a long term viable option. A hero is hard to define. A Peace-Lord is favorable as it requires food sleep water company and a bath as well as education and a will for introspection and performance of altruistic acts. A Peace-Lord requires less voliminous and extravagant material structures and resources. Peace-Lords in stillness hear more and are able to creep like cats and surprise friends with heroic acts one minute and equally compelling humbleness the next. The 2nd in charge of the World Tae-Kwondo Foundation went to the principle BMW R&D plant in Germany to department that measures impact resistance of various materials used in the automotive manufaturing process at BMW. BMW Magazine 2003 measured his hand strike (side of hand 'knifehand' aka 'Karate' chop') at .8 of a ton, to which he then with a smile easily signed autographs explaining that such a feat is attainable to those who hone a practice with aim and faith earnestless and diciple - in essence, Spirit.







Julien Landau Light passing Higgs-Boson fields becomes Hydrogen or Helium atoms. Gravity pulls Hydrogen and Helium together to form stars. Stars under their own weight compress Hydrogen and Helium with such great force that, the elements are made. After feeding from it's corona towards it's center stars eventualy run out of food/fuel and depending on the size will explode (a Supernova) which scatters the new and different elements across space/time to form planetoids/planets/stars/galaxies. The elements combine in patterns to form Life. Life then interacts with the patterns that formed it as well as other environmental patterns and conditions. In living it grows new life pattern forms as well as generating new and varied patterns in it's environment that the other Lifeforms (of like or different species), must then contend with. Are we Beast or HuWoMan? The mechanical view of the Universe is based on the notion that these parts come together to make Life that is soulless and mechanicle. Also the forces and processes that lead to Life are not Spiritual nor Religious as Neither G_d nor Angels nor Psychics nor Aliens nor Dragons nor anything irrefutably proven by science does not has not will not and can not exist. Life has no point is not leading anywhere, humans are most likely doomed, we are meaningless and insignificant as is anything and everything. It's a giant complicated accidental clock type mechanism with no point. The mechanistic view relies on false assumption as well as flawed science. Atoms do not exist as things, they are fields. When 3 atoms are placed in a containing unit and measured later on, 5 appear. Then 7. Another measure yields the original 3 atoms. How can materialsm be correct when the pillars it builds with are not there. The Japanese Samurai tradition tells a story of







Julien Landau In the search for Universal Principles we turn to Anthropology and Physics as well as other disciplines. One would think everyone worldwide wants similar things such as "Love Peace and Harmony" (as well foundational principles ranging from money and sex to all the things we take for granted in Western societies). In testing this notion of Universalism, Anthropologists and Social Anthropologists find little to no evidence for it when researching such topics as facial expressions, emotional states, words to express feelings, concepts of ownership, concepts of time, etc. What is found is akin to a global and dynamic Venn diagram with different cultures exhibiting similarities in deed or philosophy/narrative in one culture's laws linking to a similar legal structure exhibited in another culture - yet when the different perspective of the same two culture's financial structures are viewed, there are sparse-to-no similarities (that is having no interlocking circles on the 'Diagram' for the topic of 'Finance'). When cultures meet along this 'Global Venn diagram', those interlocking circles shift over time. New connections are made and others changes as environmental/cultural/global conditions change with time. Cultures may willingly or unwillingly accept or reject their neighbor's influences and traditions, technologies, language, foods, religion etc.







Julien Landau Intelligence is defined by the ability to predict and enact (based on those predictions) for a desired result, with a memory mechanism to negotiate between prediction and action. Memory mechanisms begin with quick stimulus response mechanisms (via electro/chemical reaction-channels) that require no 'thought', such as reflexes and the mechanisms continue up the evolutionary chain to include humans with photographic memory. With cybernetic technology, researches aim to one day have all of wikipedia (for instance) within our short term memory allowing us to consider many more factors/trends/lessons etc. at once! I will believe it when I see it. A Priori Knowledge works well in many cases where hyped technology is yet to be revealed to consumer markets. That said, right now we define ourselves as intelligent yet humans are sometimes wise sometimes not. When the SCR's of cultures are examined by each other much gets lost in translation. Sometimes, with all the competing internal and external drives/lessons/voices it is best to prepare for tests arriving first and counting on lessons we only know by turning off the tv and "smelling the roses".







Julien Landau Research finds speech as well as emotional states and subject's thoughts affect crystaline formations of water as it freezes in laboratorical studies with 'positive' expressions 'producing' well structured/symetrical and appealing shapes as crystal snowflakes when harmful speech/emotive states 'produced' sludge-like assymetrical shapes.







Julien Landau Naming and communication had power in this instance and the purpose of communication/naming/semantics is to enforce territory/aquire mates/understand/tool making/enterprise and all manner of power exchanges.







Julien Landau With the best choices of thought, perception, speech, action one better employs and manages one's SCR's within greater SCR's.







Julien Landau The Kabbalists influenced the Jewish tradition with their poem "He Who Saves A Single Soul Saves The Entire World". Though it uses 'he' instead of 'we' in the title and verse (I am a radical Feminist and somewhat irked by the (mostly) Patriarchal nature of my Jewish Religion and Tradition) the notion of each sentient being a world unto ourselves has been and is being confirmed by testing various Quantum mechanical theories and models. For instance, let's begin with Time. Again and again we are finding effects that occur before the cause, as well as reactions before stimulus.







Julien Landau A primary job of the intellect is to filter data. However, the intellect is not the only operative. Introspection (inwards assesment/inspection) engages different channels and pathways than (regions associated with) the intellect - as seen in MRI and Positronic scanning of test subjects engaged in thinking and reading (and similar conceptual tasks) versus sunbathing, listening to music and the like). Introspection, by having access to data via less used channels (proportionately speaking the portion responsible for higher cognitive functioning/management/intellect is the most resource intensive portion of the body), has access/recall of data once filtered by the intellect to now be synthesized/incorporated/used. We remember everything that happens to us, the problem is in recall. Introspection is a means to Insight (an 'inner' sight). This inner sight is the Spiritual Eye and our true identity. It observes environment enabling environment to exist (the environment in turn allows the Spirit, individual to exist).







Julien Landau As lifeforms evolve up the chain they jump to new capabilities (yet for their innerworking complexities) often find ultra specific sources of food or habitat and the like called niches. Varied in types of niches but not varied within the specific niche.







Julien Landau Time and where does the moment go if not the future. When the moment is gone are there traces of it extending into the Future? Do we carry the past with us right now? The 'Butterfly Effect' illustrates that what you do now has effects unseen later on a grander scale, in a wave ripple through and via SCR's and other means over time. Dutch researchers passed a laser across DNA strands only to find readings from the DNA after it had beed removed from the testing area from the same location it was placed before. Einstein theorised that by fashioning a lens large enough, and without flaw, we will observe the future. All known physical and mathematical models work as well forwards as backwards regardless of Time. A single point encompassing but not of Time and Space is the First Dimension and known as a Singularity. The second dimension is a plane in which horizontal and vertical motion is allowed. The third dimension adds a plane of diagonal motion called the Z axis. The Fourth Dimension is the time it takes to cross between dimensional fields. The Fith Dimension has the X, Y (2D) and the Y plane wraped as one unit that exists in double across two 4D (Time) fields. The 6th Dimension takes the fith and fourth imensions as a singular plane to which motion across multiple time/space frameworks at once. There are many known and mathematically proven 'higher dimensions'. The existence of these dimensions show us (and we now believe account for) possibility within our realm. The fact that electrons behave as fields of possibilities, it is now theorised is that the atoms and electrons not only build space/time but exist with influence from many dimensions, some with heir unique properties and possibilities causing various readings before during and after experiments that do not follow our 3D/4D Newtonian notions of the Universality and directedness of Time as a Unifying force, as it is not. New theories abound along the lines that everything has is and will happen at once right here and now. This is interesting as where else would it? It seems to us that things happen over time as we see cycles change, what then is real if not what is a synthesis between that which is of a higher order willed synthesised with our own will and Spirit? Darwin is correct yet being the pioneer was not privy to what we have come to see that incorporates a strict model based on his works combined with what can only be described as Lamarkism (Lamark being a contemporary and rival of Darwin). Lamarck was unsucesful with his theory that the life we see today have forms to fit the endeavours of their ancestors. Darwin contends the genes of parents may cross but they can not alter themselves or the other's genes by direct method. Behavior of the individual agent is encouraged by successful genes as it finds resources, allowing it to mate and pass those same genes it carries. According to Darwin, while carrying the genes, no matter what behavior it exhibits, it can not and does not alter the genes it seeks to pass along. Lamarck contended that Giraffes had long necks as a result of their parents having strained to reach higher and higher leaves over milenia. In Darwin's model an as of yet unknown effect caused random mutations in genes. When an offspring was (occasionally) passed altered code it would now be either successful in the wild or not, (with being successful defined by it having all basic self sustainin and reproductive systems operational at acceptable levels - the organisms behavior doesn't alter DNA, so Lamarck could not be correct. Current research in the field of Chromosome (protein) binders shows that a father with immature testes exposed to a traumatic environment are more likely to grow up to father children with anxiety disorders. Diabetes, being a hereditary disease in the Darwinian model can not be aquirerd via non-sexual means. That is either your ancestors have the gene for diabetes or not, and if they did not your children won't have diabetes. Therefore we expect to see people who do not carry the genes responssible for diabetes to develop diabetes after having eaten too much candy. Furthermore, one wouldn't expect them to pass a genetic predisposition let alone a diabetes set of genes to offspring however this does happen. These effects do not follow Dawin's model but Lamarck's. Also water fleas, that do not have spikes when then traumatised in their environment (or a laboratory simulation of their environment) have offspring with spikes, even when the parents and grandparents and great-grandparents of both sets, did not have spikes, with the Darwinian model unable to account for this observed phenomenon of breeding and environment. Nurture can not affect Nature at the genetic level of the individual in Darwins model yet as seen recently with a species of Anolis lizard spontaneously evolving from egg laying to Live birth reproductive and child rearing methods. The Anbolis lives in Jamaica and was seen spontaneously jumping (stacking) up the evolutionary scale by switching from egg laying child rearing (as seen in archaeological as well as direct observation in all recorded writen and oral traditions from locals and scientists). Also what we have yet to identify as the means by which the same genes will change on different would be parents at the same time for radical changes so that a four legged creature would have wings and not two hind legs, be upright but flightless stumps amidst carnivores. Penguins are aquatic and what were their ancestors means of flight were adapted over time suiting better the waters as fins flippers as swiftness undersea allows better fish hunt in their location with seals being one of few clumsy hunters). Snakes started with four legs then dropped them (they also had one penis then went to two went back to one and are now two again over milenia). The flightless bird's ancestor had flight. The Archtaeroptrix as well as the Ptderadactyl both flew. We don't find evidence of the in between state, for a running creature with stumps instead of wings not a bird yet amid dinausaurs would likely be eaten before it could mate. The line from dinausaur to bird jumped immediately from a succesful four legged running creature to a flying one without the awkward and weak stage in between. This does not fit any model of evolution as Evolution itself must account for phenomenon as of yet not understood. Evolution, like Gravity and Electromagnetism are phenomenon we can observe yet admitedly do not understand yet. Future tools may yield new measurements of new fields and the like. Signs of a Higher Order/Field/Intelligence are argued by many to account for phenomenon not yet understood. Stage Magic is best understood when we can see behind the scenes. Yogis, who perform mysteriuous bafdfling seemingly impossible acts ascribe their methods as scientific that with practice expected results will be observable. Magick is defined by practitioners as a means to affect change with will via unseen ways. Perhaps Spirituality and Magick involved means/technologies/phenomenon/fields and Science we have yet to understand. With newer tools leading to discovery of different observable testable repeatable phenomenon, as well as continued integration of our knowledge the stacking towards a Unified Field Theory is within grasp. Competing with Gravity wave theory and String World Theory is the Many Worlds theory - all contenders towards Grand Unified Field Theory.







Julien Landau Patterns lead to stated or assumed/expected agreements which lead to stated or understood (social) contracts which leads to laws and such. Everytime we stop at a signal or stay within yellow lines it is as a contract with other drivers as they work with knowing you follow the contract as well. SCR's are socially constructed contracts as well as constructed realities. A characteristic of higher order stacking is increased specificity wherein very specific foods or wants or needs, as well as perspectives flourish.







Julien Landau The same patterns that make us make the space and means for communication, though communication is now understood to include means undreamt of. For instance, with quantum entaglement the 'spin' of photons will instantly flip when their twin entangled pair has it's spin reversed, across vast oceans of galaxies instantaneously the pair will continue to operate with a faster than light (instant) form of communication, and there is research that shows trees communicate with one another and that communication can and does follow many unseen means (how trees do it we don't know). Gravity affects everything at once where our movements instantly affect distant galaxies (and vice versa) in ways not understood. Evolution must have forces at play besides the synthesis of Darwinian as well as Lamarckian/Behavioral (effective via Protein Binding) models. One effect is knowlege and memory passed via consumption of biomass. Flatworks are set in a maze to find electric shock at one end and food at another. Over time they learn to avoid the maze hall leading to shock while heading towards food. The flatworms wereground and fed to other flatworms that then immediately, when placed in the same maze environment, avoid the hallway to shock and choose the hallway to food (without having been exposed to that or any maze before). The experiment is replicated in rats. Though it speaks to notions of morphogenetic fields and blood memory it does not account for the radical jumps from one level of evolutionary higherarchy by Quantum Leap to a higher rung. Many fields/Astronomical bodies/Biological phenomenon etc. are known yet too much is yet to be discovered to wait to form an opiniuon about what is wrong from right based on the latest findings or what is found in books. Ultimately the onus is upon us individually to find thge best way suitable to us and hopefully all others. It helps to know where we come from who we are who we can be where we are going. These answers will come from a unified interdiciplanery approiach that combines scientific like pursuits and structure with altruistic aims and furthering not just further science, apart from Religion and Spirituality as well as other modalities instead with changes in nomenclature and semantics the name and associatiated predispositons/attitudes of the SCR's such as Church State and Science themselves are alterable were it willed and necessary. Fluidity is a principle of our Grand Universe all that is found to be static exists perhapos in singularities klnown as black hgoles for thewrein may be Dimension One. String theory indicates blackholes leading to other Univewrses. Gravity Wave theory has light matter and energies as forever spinning and trapped inside, we certainly know we dont know and in the pursuit may find a theory to better explain gravity and other phenomenon that elude us.







Julien Landau Mathematics require hypothesis, and with the logic having been proved, need do no more. Physics on the other hand must describe real phenomenon, or proposed forces that could be real. Math may remain theoretical and imaginary. Physics which was the domain of Philosophy until 200 years ago now requires Mathematics to prove it's theories. Math has hypothesis and may be imaginary or real. Physics has theories and ultimately it's theories must match up with what is real and/or observed in Nature. Quantum mechanics and gravity are currently at odds. Neither special nor general relativity theories are at odds with gravity. Quantum field theory unified quantum mechanics and special relativity, however without an adequate description of gravity at a quantum level we are unable to theorize the Grand Unified Field Theory. String theory is an attempt to explain gravity at quantum levels while Superstring theory is a contender for the Grand Unified Field Theory. Time and Space were considered distinct and static frameworks until Eistein postulated SpaceTime as a unified and maleable fabric. Gravity, he argued, happens when an object having aquired so much mass as to be a Star pulls down on the fabric pulling objects nearby on the fabric towards it. Before, it was believed everything (including light) moved around inside a space that didn't change and moved by means of time that changed but only in a forward direction. Einstein postulated that Light though it moves, remains the same speed and it is everything around it that changes to match this Law...now it won't be a law until 100-200 years from now when it is deemed Einsteins theories have been exhaustively tested and the Constant speed of light ('C') does not, in fact change and Albert was right it is a law. The three Newtonian Laws of Physics are laws as they remained valid and were thoroughly tested for so long that they were Canonised, and remain valid from the molecular level (and upwards) in speeds approaching neither Absolute Zero (Supreme Cold as defined by lack of movement), approaching perfect vacuum states, nor approaching the speed of light (where Newtonian Physics no longer describes phenomenon). Faster than light effects do not necessarily invalidate Newtonian, Quantum nor General Relativity theories/laws. Electrons move faster than light as they engage in an activity called 'Electron Tunneling' sometimes refered to as Quantum tunneling. Tachyon particles may exist, moving not faster the way a runner would sprint a mile but instead wormholing into and out of the SpaceTime fabric faster than light. Were objects teleported or transported across the galaxy not by means of the particles travelling faster than the speed of light (but by movement of quantum entangled data processors at both ends, or Tachyon drives, gravity field manipulation used to pull the fabric of SpaceTime towards us, etc.) Causality would not be compromised and time would remain the same for both objects with no time travel other than the time it took to flip switches and pilot a ship. Mass approaching the speed of light by known physical means gains more mass as it approaches a point where to match the speed of light it must gain infinite mass and velocity - meanwhile it stretches to an infinite length and time slows down to an infinitelyt slow progression because Light must remain a constant speed to which matter nor time nor space may not match it as it is what time matter and space are made of.







Julien Landau If faster than light communication is possible via entangled pairs without causality disturbance, what other forms of communication are occuring? Communication implies intelligence. Communication is a means to connect and network. Invisible networking communication channels are called morphogenetic fields. The Universe is a hologram each one of us a piece of the whole containing the whole in each one of us. When something occurs it affects us and there are other ways to communicate and perceive than mere spoken word or direct observation in a laboratory that is verified scientifically.







Julien Landau The thoughts that lead to this writing are caused by conditions that I arise out of and am part of. how much part of? I observe myself separate is this true are there other perspectives that indicate otherwise some scientifically shown. I am introspecting into that which made me and that which made me, made me introspect, hence communication and communication is networking towards efficient unified stacking growth expansion play Life, etc.











Julien Landau The fabric of spacetime is accelerating at or beyond the speed of Light. A unified theory employing nonlocal space/time geometry enables greater stacking in hopes to, from our new vantage point (with ensuing tech) will better understand gravity, magnetism etc.







Ron Prussman Neither actually travel. As finite beings, we obsess over measuring our surroundings, based on perspective. (alternate explanation of relativity)







Julien Landau For our society to work we employ the scarcity model - work for cash to trade for goods. Alternatively the abundance model tells us there is enough for everyone, we just aren't sharing correctly. Space Time Energy Light everything anything that has been and will be is right here and now, if we change our internal and external SCR models from scarcity to abundance it will be in tune and in line with Nature, however we have to do it. We must choose, every time, via the power of naming and pausing to consider, whether the deed thought action plays into and is part of a benneficial pattern/SCR or not. As it is our base directives overpower us. Further clouding the keen judgement made when in communion with one's Spirit are internal and external societal patterns/SCR's causing confusiuon keeping us from free open blanaced internal and external communicvation and means.







Ron Prussman Exactly. Definition is based on context and perspective. Nothing is truly defined. Definition limits ability 'to be'.







Ron Prussman Read the edit. ;) When we call a tree a tree, we have limited it to being what a tree can be. The only thing that is factual, is that this being we call 'tree'....is.







Julien Landau Thanks Ron Prussman!







Ron Prussman I Am. That is true. Everything else is a pretty little box that fits into someone's perception of reality.







Julien Landau and toast falls butter side down







Ron Prussman Unless it is strapped to a cat's back.







Julien Landau ! :p







Julien Landau antigravity?







Julien Landau U.S.A.F. secret butered toast machines piloted by upside down cats







Ron Prussman More like: Science needs to re-define itself to explain what it did not predict, because science is observation. Prediction models are based on mathematics, not observation.







Ron Prussman The verb 'to be' is truth. 1 and 0 are truth. Defining what being is, or what 1 and 0 mean, are philosophy.







Ron Prussman I wish I knew the rain dance that brings lightning to a specific spot. Would be much easier than trying to find a lighter when mine dies at a very bad time.







Mass approaching the speed of light by known physical means gains more mass as it approaches a point where, to match the speed of light, it must gain infinite mass and velocity - meanwhile it stretches to an infinite length and time slows down to an infinitely slow progression. Time and again Einstein's theories have proven to predict outcomes based on his models, whether by the recent perfect gyroscope satelite experiment, various studies conducted with neutron multiplicity meters inside deep underground muon-induced high-energy neutron measurement facility(ies), the jetplane atomic clock studies, etc. That spacetime goes as fast as light at the edge of spacetime is by reference to us. At the edge, as no resistance is offered it expands, not transports by light or FTL (faster than light) means that do not affect causality restrictions.







Julien Landau If everything came from what appears a Void, it may look void the way combining all paint colors yield black and said void is in fact Pure Possibility that can't appear as anything or be measured because it's the possibility of everything and has not proceeded.







Ron Prussman Are the new elements that are found at a nuclear test site actually a simple byproduct of radiation, or evidence of opening a small door, for a short time, and elements that are unstable in 'our' universe coming through?











Ron Prussman Do photons actually move, are they in more than one place at a time, or can they simply be observed (in real time) from wherever they may be? We have no concrete evidence that we are seeing stars as they were millions of years ago. We do, however, have minds that cannot comprehend infinity.







Christopher Boone Did you see the article a few weeks ago about the scientists finally making a microscope strong enough to look into and study an atom, and only to find it is hollow and now all their photons/electrons/etc. ideas are thrown out the window.....you might have to google for it, cos they were quick to drown it with the typical daily negative news.







Julien Landau Ron Prussman Christopher Boone Thank you for your insightful comments!!







Julien Landau Neil Rowe This is the 30 pager...I will also tag you in my suggested Government Change post